Menu

Pope Francis’ Crusade to Reform the Catholic Church Progress, Pushback, and the Road Ahead

Pope Francis’ Crusade to Reform the Catholic Church Progress, Pushback, and the Road Ahead

Vatican City — When Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio became Pope Francis in 2013, he inherited a Church reeling from scandals and internal crises. From financial misconduct at the Vatican Bank to a global clerical sex abuse epidemic, the new pope faced intense pressure to clean house. Francis has since launched an ambitious campaign to reform Catholic institutions and culture from within – a campaign marked by bold initiatives toward transparency and accountability, but also fierce resistance from traditionalist factions. Twelve years into his papacy, Francis’ reformist zeal has earned both praise and criticism as he seeks to reshape the Church’s governance, pastoral approach, and moral credibility in the modern world.

Financial Scandals and the Push for Transparency

For decades, the Vatican’s finances had been shrouded in secrecy – and periodically rocked by scandal. Pope Francis made fiscal reform a top priority early in his papacy, determined to root out corruption and bring the Holy See in line with international standards. Within months of taking office, he moved to “crackdown on financial corruption” with new policies aimed at greater transparency (Pope Francis' new decree demands financial transparency from Vatican managers). One of his first acts was to clean up the Vatican Bank (formally the Institute for the Works of Religion, or IOR), long notorious as “God’s bank.” Thousands of dubious accounts were closed, external auditors were engaged, and a new Secretariat for the Economy was established to oversee all Vatican financial dealings. Cardinal George Pell, whom Francis tapped to lead the Secretariat in 2014, famously discovered hundreds of millions of euros “tucked away” off the official balance sheets, prompting tighter controls on how departments manage funds. Pope Francis also committed the Vatican to international anti-corruption agreements, insisting that “transparency…preventing conflicts of interest, patronage practices and corruption” must be standard (Pope Francis' new decree demands financial transparency from Vatican managers).

(As Cardinal Becciu goes to court, Francis' financial reforms also on trial | National Catholic Reporter) The Institute for the Works of Religion (IOR), commonly known as the Vatican bank, is headquartered in a medieval tower at the Vatican. As part of Pope Francis’s financial reforms, the bank and other Vatican entities have undergone audits and come under stricter regulations to curb misconduct (Pope Francis' new decree demands financial transparency from Vatican managers). Vatican prosecutors have pursued cases such as a costly London real estate scandal that led to the indictment of a once-powerful cardinal and the arrest of several Vatican officials (Pope Francis' new decree demands financial transparency from Vatican managers). In an unprecedented move, Francis removed the Secretariat of State (the Vatican’s top administration office) from controlling its multimillion-euro asset portfolio after investigations showed funds were entangled in the dubious London deal (Pope Francis' new decree demands financial transparency from Vatican managers). By 2021, the pope even updated Vatican law to allow cardinals and bishops to be tried by lay judges, clearing the way for a landmark tribunal of Cardinal Giovanni Angelo Becciu on charges of embezzlement and fraud. The ongoing “trial of the century,” as it’s been called, marks the first time in modern history that a Roman Catholic cardinal has faced a criminal trial for financial crimes in a Vatican court (As Cardinal Becciu goes to court, Francis' financial reforms also on trial | National Catholic Reporter) (As Cardinal Becciu goes to court, Francis' financial reforms also on trial | National Catholic Reporter). Observers say the bold prosecution is “the sharpest sign of Francis’ evolving legal strategy” to hold even high-ranking prelates accountable (As Cardinal Becciu goes to court, Francis' financial reforms also on trial | National Catholic Reporter).

The reform effort has shown results, albeit with some growing pains. An independent review by Moneyval – a European financial watchdog – gave the Vatican a largely positive evaluation in 2021 for tightening oversight of its bank and financial intelligence unit. The report found the Holy See’s authorities had a “generally good high-level understanding” of money laundering risks and praised new laws allowing seizure of assets even without a conviction (The Vatican and Moneyval: What’s changed? | Catholic News Agency) (The Vatican and Moneyval: What’s changed? | Catholic News Agency). But Moneyval also flagged concerns: only two money-laundering convictions had been obtained at that point, and investigations were hampered by limited expert personnel (The Vatican and Moneyval: What’s changed? | Catholic News Agency). In other words, the legal framework had improved, but the Vatican’s small judicial system was still catching up in enforcement. Critics have noted that some Vatican departments remained opaque or slow to reform; even Francis acknowledged entrenched interests fighting change. Nonetheless, the overall trend is toward openness. “No one should be bothered by the fact that the Vatican is being scrutinized — it’s a sign the reforms are working,” Francis has argued in interviews, framing scandals as painful but necessary to expose wrongdoing. The pope’s allies point out that Benedict XVI actually began this work by creating a financial watchdog in 2010, but Francis has “significantly expanded oversight” and empowered independent audits and prosecutions (As Cardinal Becciu goes to court, Francis' financial reforms also on trial | National Catholic Reporter) (As Cardinal Becciu goes to court, Francis' financial reforms also on trial | National Catholic Reporter). Under St. John Paul II, by contrast, the Vatican often kept financial affairs behind closed doors. Notoriously, when Italian prosecutors in the 1980s sought to question Archbishop Paul Marcinkus over the Vatican Bank’s role in the collapse of Banco Ambrosiano, John Paul II sheltered the bank chief inside Vatican City – effectively placing him beyond the reach of Italian law (As Cardinal Becciu goes to court, Francis' financial reforms also on trial | National Catholic Reporter). Pope Francis has pointedly broken with that old culture of immunity, declaring that justice must apply within Vatican walls just as in any other state.

Still, not everyone is convinced the financial cleanup has gone far enough. Some Vatican insiders worry that Francis’ reforms, while well-intentioned, depend on the vigor of his appointees and could be rolled back under a future pope less interested in transparency. And traditionalists have bristled at the centralization of financial control under new entities, complaining that the pope’s team sometimes acts unilaterally. Yet for many outside observers, these measures were long overdue. As one Catholic journalist quipped, “untraceable cash transfers and a culture of secrecy made the Vatican Bank one of the world’s most notorious financial institutions” – a reputation Francis is determined to erase (Can Pope Francis clean up God's bank? | Vatican - The Guardian) (As Cardinal Becciu goes to court, Francis' financial reforms also on trial | National Catholic Reporter). The true test of the pope’s efforts will be whether they can outlast his pontificate: institutionalizing a culture of accountability in Vatican finances so that old habits don’t creep back when media attention fades.

Confronting the Clerical Sexual Abuse Crisis

No challenge has tested the Catholic Church’s integrity quite like the clerical sexual abuse crisis. When Pope Francis assumed the papacy, the Church was still dealing with the fallout of abuse revelations that had come to light under John Paul II and Benedict XVI. Francis vowed “zero tolerance” for predators and those who cover for them. Over the past decade, he has implemented new structures and laws to address the scandal – from holding bishops accountable for negligence to updating canon law to strengthen punishments for abusive clergy.

One of Francis’s first major moves was establishing the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors in 2014, bringing in experts and abuse survivors to advise on safeguarding policies. He followed up with highly symbolic gestures, meeting with victims of abuse and begging forgiveness on behalf of the Church’s leadership. In February 2019, Francis convened an unprecedented global summit at the Vatican, gathering all the presidents of national bishops’ conferences to face the reality of abuse. “We hear the cry of the little ones asking for justice,” he told the bishops, urging “concrete, effective measures” to end abuse (Opening summit, Pope urges 'concrete, effective measures' on abuse). In his closing address, the pope did not mince words: he condemned priest-predators as “tools of Satan” whose acts are “utterly incompatible with [the Church’s] moral authority and ethical credibility” (Francis ends Vatican summit with promise church will 'decisively confront' abuse | National Catholic Reporter). He promised that the Church would “decisively confront” the scourge of abuse (Francis ends Vatican summit with promise church will 'decisively confront' abuse | National Catholic Reporter) and make the safety of children a paramount priority. At the same time, Francis cautioned against treating the issue only as a public-relations crisis, warning Church officials not to fall into “justicialism…provoked by media pressure” (Francis ends Vatican summit with promise church will 'decisively confront' abuse | National Catholic Reporter) – a remark that some survivor advocates interpreted as a worrying desire to control the narrative. Indeed, advocacy groups swiftly criticized the summit’s final statements as vague. The gap between powerful rhetoric and concrete action has been a recurring point of contention.

On the legal front, however, Pope Francis has enacted sweeping changes. In 2019, he issued the landmark decree Vos estis lux mundi (“You are the light of the world”), which for the first time in Church history mandated that all Catholic priests and religious worldwide report any suspicions of abuse or cover-up (Pope Francis makes 'Vos Estis' clergy abuse law permanent | National Catholic Reporter). The norms, initially implemented on a trial basis, also established procedures to investigate bishops accused of misconduct. Under this system, metropolitan archbishops are given the authority to oversee preliminary inquiries into allegations against suffragan bishops – a novel mechanism aimed at ending the era of unaccountable bishops. After a four-year experimental period, Francis made Vos estis permanent in 2023 and even expanded it. The updated rules explicitly include lay Catholic leaders in charge of international associations in its purview, meaning that laypeople running Church-approved organizations can now be held accountable for abuse or its cover-up (Pope confirms ‘Vos estis lux mundi’ procedures against abuse - Vatican News) (Pope Francis makes 'Vos Estis' clergy abuse law permanent | National Catholic Reporter). The revised norms also require every diocese globally to have a clear office or system for reporting abuse allegations (no more merely symbolic guidelines) (Pope Francis makes 'Vos Estis' clergy abuse law permanent | National Catholic Reporter). And for the first time, Vatican law now extends protections to adults who may be vulnerable to abuse – not only minors – by defining victims to include persons with “imperfect use of reason” or those who are vulnerable due to power imbalances (Pope Francis makes 'Vos Estis' clergy abuse law permanent | National Catholic Reporter).

Just as significantly, Pope Francis abolished the so-called “pontifical secret” in cases of sexual abuse. In a move hailed by canon lawyers and survivor advocates, he decreed in December 2019 that accusations, trials and verdicts in abuse cases “are not bound by the pontifical secret” (As Cardinal Becciu goes to court, Francis' financial reforms also on trial | National Catholic Reporter). For decades, that high level of confidentiality had been blamed for Church officials’ refusal to share information with civil authorities or victims; lifting it aimed to encourage transparency and cooperation with law enforcement (As Cardinal Becciu goes to court, Francis' financial reforms also on trial | National Catholic Reporter). “Legitimate requests for Church documents in litigation should be respected,” explained Fr. Thomas Doyle, a veteran canon lawyer who has long advocated for survivors (As Cardinal Becciu goes to court, Francis' financial reforms also on trial | National Catholic Reporter). Doyle praised Francis for finally removing a tool of silence that had hampered investigations (As Cardinal Becciu goes to court, Francis' financial reforms also on trial | National Catholic Reporter), though he noted that some dioceses still try to impose confidentiality in legal settlements. “Having the pope on your side in a civil pleading helps,” Doyle said, suggesting that Francis’ clear stance strengthens victims’ hand in court (As Cardinal Becciu goes to court, Francis' financial reforms also on trial | National Catholic Reporter).

Pope Francis has also revised the Code of Canon Law itself to address sexual crimes more rigorously. In 2021, he promulgated a long-planned update to the penal section of canon law (Book VI), creating specific categories for sexual abuse, including abuse of minors and vulnerable adults, and explicitly penalizing bishops and superiors who neglect to address abuse cases. The pope described this legal reform as part of “bringing the Church closer to procedures in Western courts” (As Cardinal Becciu goes to court, Francis' financial reforms also on trial | National Catholic Reporter) – essentially aligning Church law with contemporary expectations of justice. The combination of canon law changes and Vatican City prosecutions represents what one Church analyst called a “two-pronged approach”: Francis is using his authority as the Church’s supreme lawmaker to change internal norms, while also leveraging the Vatican’s civil judicial system to show that even clergy can face trial and punishment (As Cardinal Becciu goes to court, Francis' financial reforms also on trial | National Catholic Reporter) (As Cardinal Becciu goes to court, Francis' financial reforms also on trial | National Catholic Reporter).

Despite these steps, Francis’s record on abuse has not been without controversy or setbacks. Early in his pontificate, he stumbled in handling a high-profile case in Chile, initially dismissing credible accusations against a bishop as “slander.” After public outcry and an investigation, Francis did an about-face: he apologized, admitted “grave errors” in judgment, and secured the resignation of several Chilean bishops in 2018. The episode was a lesson in the potency of survivor testimony and media scrutiny in pushing Church leaders to act. It also illustrated the resistance within the hierarchy – Francis had relied on local bishops’ accounts initially, which downplayed victims’ claims, reflecting a culture of denial he was trying to change. In 2018, the Vatican was rocked by an extraordinary public letter from a former papal diplomat, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, who alleged that Francis knew about sexual misconduct by ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick and failed to act. The pope declined to respond directly to Viganò’s inflammatory charges (which also implicated John Paul II and Benedict XVI’s administrations), instead commissioning a thorough archival investigation. The resulting McCarrick Report, released in 2020, revealed systemic failures over decades and showed that John Paul II had promoted McCarrick despite rumors of misconduct (Criticism of Pope John Paul II - Wikipedia). Francis ultimately defrocked McCarrick in 2019, signaling that no rank – not even cardinal – would protect an abuser from the gravest Church penalty. Yet the incident fueled conservative criticism and raised questions about why it took until Francis’s reign to see such accountability at the highest levels. Indeed, John Paul II’s legacy on abuse is mixed at best: he has been criticized for “turning a blind eye” to cases like that of Fr. Marcial Maciel, the influential Mexican priest later exposed as a serial predator (Criticism of Pope John Paul II - Wikipedia) (Criticism of Pope John Paul II - Wikipedia). Benedict XVI, for his part, was more proactive; as Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger he pressed for investigations (famously lamenting “filth in the Church”) and as pope he laicized hundreds of abusive priests. But even Benedict faced internal resistance and left some business unfinished when he resigned.

Today, Pope Francis’s anti-abuse framework is in place, but its effectiveness hinges on implementation. By early 2023, the Vatican disclosed that at least 30 bishops globally had been investigated under Vos estis procedures, resulting in sanctions or removals in some cases (Pope Francis makes 'Vos Estis' clergy abuse law permanent | National Catholic Reporter). Yet victims’ organizations argue that much more transparency is needed – they note that the Vatican has not published comprehensive data on Vos estis cases or outcomes (Pope Francis makes 'Vos Estis' clergy abuse law permanent | National Catholic Reporter). Some high-ranking offenders have been quietly disciplined or asked to resign without public explanations, breeding skepticism about a true “zero tolerance” policy. And just this year, a prominent Jesuit priest in Slovenia was convicted by a Church court of abuse, but the Vatican’s decision not to laicize him (citing his age and repentance) drew outrage from local Catholics who felt it sent the wrong signal of leniency. Meanwhile, a founding member of Francis’s own abuse commission, Irish survivor Marie Collins, resigned in frustration in 2017, citing curial officials’ reluctance to cooperate with the commission’s proposals. More recently, in 2023, respected Jesuit Father Hans Zollner left the commission amid concerns it lacked resources and independence. These incidents underscore the institutional inertia and pushback that can impede Francis’s reforms on the ground.

In response, the pope has doubled down on stressing that the Church must change its culture. “Hear the cry of the little ones,” he wrote in a 2018 letter to all Catholics, urging an end to clerical cover-ups and a spirit of penance and solidarity with victims. He has reminded bishops that canon law now makes reporting abuse obligatory – and that failure to act has spiritual consequences too. In a powerful gesture, Francis added abuse of minors to the list of gravest sins in Church teaching (placing it alongside heresy and schism) and even updated the Vatican’s catechism to explicitly condemn abuse. All these efforts mark a stark departure from the era of John Paul II, when the Vatican was often accused of hush-hush handling and protecting the institution’s reputation above all. As veteran Vatican watcher John Allen noted, “Francis’ reforms have laid the groundwork for ethical policies” that simply did not exist a generation ago (Pope's plea to cardinals marks latest step in long-running financial ...). Yet the pope also faces the reality that trust, once shattered, is hard to rebuild. Many abuse survivors and advocates remain skeptical, adopting a “trust but verify” stance toward Francis’s pledges. They are pushing for more lay oversight and for the Church to institutionalize transparency – for example, by publicly reporting the disciplinary actions taken against abusers and enablers. In their eyes, Pope Francis has taken important steps forward, but the ultimate judgment will depend on whether children and vulnerable people in parishes are actually safer and whether bishops know unequivocally that covering up abuse will end their careers.

Resistance from the Conservative Wing: Liturgy, Doctrine and “Culture Wars”

While Pope Francis has been trying to reform Church governance and make it more accountable, he has also advocated for a pastoral shift in the Church’s tone and approach on various issues. This has put him at odds with a vocal conservative minority within the Catholic world – including some senior bishops and influential Catholic media – who see his leadership as a break from tradition. Over the past decade, flashpoints have included liturgical reforms, Francis’s outreach to LGBTQ+ Catholics, and his emphasis on synodality (a more decentralized, consultative model of Church decision-making). These areas, in different ways, have prompted an unusual degree of internal dissent, with some conservatives accusing the pope of sowing confusion or even betraying Catholic doctrine.

Liturgical Reforms and Traditionalist Backlash

Nothing symbolizes the Church’s tradition quite like the Mass, and changes to Catholic liturgy have historically stirred strong emotions. In July 2021, Pope Francis ignited a firestorm in traditionalist circles when he issued new rules restricting the old Latin Mass. His motu proprio decree Traditionis Custodes (“Guardians of the Tradition”) effectively overturned the generous permissions his predecessor Benedict XVI had given in 2007 for widespread celebration of the pre–Vatican II Tridentine Mass. Francis cited concerns that the old liturgy was being used to foment division and opposition to the reforms of the Second Vatican Council. In an accompanying letter, he lamented that what was meant to be a pastoral concession had instead been exploited by some to question the Council’s authority and create parallel communities. Therefore, he said, in order to preserve the Church’s unity, the traditional Latin Mass needed tighter controls. Traditionis Custodes dramatically rolled back where and by whom the 1962 Latin rite can be celebrated, requiring bishops’ explicit permission and banning it from ordinary parish churches in most cases.

The reaction from traditionalist Catholics was swift and intense. Cardinal Raymond Burke, a former Vatican supreme court judge and a figurehead of the Church’s conservative wing, blasted Francis’s decree as unnecessarily harsh. He argued it was wrong to claim that the post-Vatican II Mass is the “unique expression” of Roman Rite worship, as Traditionis Custodes did, because the older Tridentine rite had “never ceased” being a part of the Church’s life (Traditionis custodes - Wikipedia). Burke, along with others, publicly questioned whether the pope even had the authority to revoke what a prior pope had allowed. He denounced the new restrictions as “severe and revolutionary” (Traditionis custodes - Wikipedia). Similarly, Cardinal Gerhard Müller, a former doctrine chief, said Francis was “hitting [the sheep] with his crook” instead of, in his view, smelling like them, implying the pope had shown more patience with liturgical abuses on the progressive end than with those attached to the old rite (Traditionis custodes - Wikipedia). Retired Cardinal Joseph Zen of Hong Kong – himself a staunch traditionalist – lamented that “many good people” who simply loved the Latin liturgy had been hurt by the pope’s broad-brush approach, even though “they have never given the smallest reason to be suspected of not accepting Vatican II” (Traditionis custodes - Wikipedia) (Traditionis custodes - Wikipedia). On the other hand, some Church leaders supported Francis’s move. Cardinal Walter Kasper, a veteran of the Vatican II era, said that while the Latin Mass may be cherished by a minority, a subset of its adherents had indeed used it to reject the Council “more or less in its entirety,” threatening Church unity (Traditionis custodes - Wikipedia). Those faithful effectively turned Benedict XVI’s outreach into a weapon of division, Kasper argued, thereby justifying Francis’s intervention (Traditionis custodes - Wikipedia).

(Traditional Latin Mass advocates prove Pope Francis was right to suppress the old rite | National Catholic Reporter) A sacramentary (altar missal) used during a traditional Latin Mass. Pope Francis’s decision to rein in the pre-Vatican II liturgy – after reports that it had become a rallying point for anti-Vatican II sentiment – has been one of his most controversial reforms. He maintains it was needed to reaffirm the unity of worship after Vatican II, but critics contend it unfairly punishes Catholics devoted to the older rite. Some traditionalist priests and lay groups have openly chafed at the new rules, appealing to bishops (and sometimes finding sympathetic ones) to continue Latin Masses under dispensations. In the United States and France, especially, the “liturgical wars” have flared up: parishioners attached to the Tridentine Mass have held prayer rallies and petition drives, while progressive Catholics have voiced relief that the pope is curbing what they saw as a parallel Church. “The traditional Latin Mass had become an incubator for division. Schism is in the air along with the incense,” wrote one commentator, noting that even some who “wailed” over the restrictions inadvertently proved Francis’s point by their extreme reactions (Traditional Latin Mass advocates prove Pope Francis was right to suppress the old rite | National Catholic Reporter). Three years on, the verdict is mixed. In many dioceses, the old Latin Mass continues in limited form with papal permission, but the pope’s firm line has prompted some hardcore traditionalists to drift toward breakaway groups or online forums fanning talk of apostasy in Rome. For Pope Francis, who has said he “will not negotiate” on the legacy of Vatican II, this was a hill worth taking. Yet the emotional fallout shows how reforming the Church’s internal culture – even something as specific as liturgical style – can reverberate widely, stirring debates about tradition, obedience, and the direction of Catholic identity.

A Pastoral Opening to LGBTQ+ Catholics

From his very first months as pontiff, Pope Francis set a new tone in the Church’s approach to LGBTQ+ individuals – one of welcome and respect, rather than distance or judgment. Famously, when asked in 2013 about a gay person seeking God, Francis answered, “Who am I to judge?” That single rhetorical question marked a sea change in attitude. He didn’t propose changing Catholic doctrine (which still considers homosexual activity sinful), but he emphasized the human dignity of gay people and cautioned against marginalizing them. Over the years, Francis has met quietly with transgender men and women, invited gay and trans guests to his residence for lunch, written encouraging letters to Catholic LGBTQ ministries, and in interviews affirmed that homosexuality “is not a crime” (adding, however, that in Church teaching it “is a sin” – making a distinction between legal status and moral theology). He has also endorsed civil legislation to protect same-sex couples’ rights. In a 2020 documentary, Francis made waves by openly supporting the idea of civil unions for gay couples as a way to secure their legal rights – a stance that startled many, even though he had suggested similar in private years earlier.

Francis’s more inclusive stance has been praised by Catholics who felt the Church had been too cold or condemnatory toward LGBTQ+ people. His outreach has included giving Jesuit Fr. James Martin, a prominent advocate for LGBTQ Catholics, a platform and multiple audiences. In 2019, Pope Francis received Fr. Martin at the Vatican in a widely noted private meeting. The audience was seen as a “public vote of confidence” in Martin’s ministry to gay Catholics, which had drawn sharp criticism from some U.S. bishops and conservative activists (Pope meets with Jesuit criticized by conservatives for gay outreach | Crux) (Pope meets with Jesuit criticized by conservatives for gay outreach | Crux). The pope’s support sent a clear message that those ministering with compassion to LGBTQ communities are not pariahs in the Church. Martin later said Francis listened intently as he relayed “the joys and hopes, and the griefs and anxieties, of LGBT Catholics” around the world (Pope meets with Jesuit criticized by conservatives for gay outreach | Crux). Such encounters, combined with Francis’s refusal to use dismissive language about sexual minorities (he even removed the phrase “intrinsically disordered” from a revised Vatican document on ministry to youth, opting for less hurtful wording), have given many LGBTQ Catholics a sense of being seen by the Church in a new way.

Yet Pope Francis has also tried to walk a fine line – seeking to welcome LGBTQ individuals without altering core teachings on sexuality and marriage. This tightrope walk has led to mixed signals and frustrations on both sides of the debate. In March 2021, the Vatican’s doctrinal office (with Francis’s approval) issued a formal response stating that the Church cannot bless same-sex unions because it “cannot bless sin.” That document, while reiterating longstanding teaching, disappointed those who had hoped Francis’s kinder tone might herald concrete changes in pastoral practice. It also prompted a rare public dissent: across Germany and other countries, some Catholic priests carried out blessing ceremonies for gay couples in protest. Then, in 2023, on the eve of a major synod, Francis took the highly unusual step of replying to a set of “dubia” – formal questions – submitted by several conservative cardinals. One question challenged him on whether the Church could ever bless same-sex unions without betraying doctrine. Francis’s nuanced answer acknowledged that marriage is only between a man and woman (Pope Francis responds to dubia submitted by five cardinals - Vatican News) and insisted the Church must avoid any rite that gives the impression of equating other unions with marriage (Pope Francis responds to dubia submitted by five cardinals - Vatican News). However, he added that “pastoral charity” might allow for certain blessings for individuals in same-sex relationships, so long as no confusion is caused about what is being blessed (Pope Francis responds to dubia submitted by five cardinals - Vatican News) (Pope Francis responds to dubia submitted by five cardinals - Vatican News). He emphasized that priests must show “kindness, patience, understanding, tenderness, and encouragement” to everyone – “we cannot be judges who only deny, reject, and exclude” (Pope Francis responds to dubia submitted by five cardinals - Vatican News). Such blessings, Francis suggested, would not celebrate a union as a marriage, but rather pray for the persons involved to receive God’s grace in their lives (Pope Francis responds to dubia submitted by five cardinals - Vatican News).

This delicate suggestion – essentially permitting, in specific cases, a prayerful blessing for people (not any official recognition of a same-sex union) – nonetheless alarmed conservative Catholics and delighted some progressives. To his critics on the right, it seemed Francis was inching the Church toward acceptance of relationships it has always taught are immoral. Some accused him of pastoral ambiguity that could confuse the faithful about Catholic teaching on marriage. Indeed, in the U.S., a few bishops publicly declared they would not allow any such blessings, arguing the pope’s remarks were not officially changing the rules. On the left, however, LGBTQ Catholics and allies cautiously welcomed Francis’s words but also noted the limits: the Church was not changing doctrine or sacramental practice, and gay couples still cannot marry in the Church or receive a formal blessing of their union. In fact, Pope Francis has held the line on issues like same-sex marriage – affirming that the Church’s understanding of marriage as between a man and woman is definitive. He has similarly stood by teachings on gender ideology, cautioning against modern concepts that erase sexual differences, which puts him at odds with some secular progressive trends.

The conservative resistance to Francis’s approach on LGBTQ+ issues has been fervent. To some extent, it mirrors culture-war battles playing out in society. A subset of bishops and Catholic media commentators (such as those on EWTN, a large religious television network) regularly criticize the pope for being, in their view, too accommodating to modern sexual mores. They worry that his famous “Who am I to judge?” quip and his focus on mercy have overshadowed clear teaching about repentance and sin. These critics often point to Francis’s relative silence on topics like contraception and same-sex marriage in his major documents, contrasting it with John Paul II’s emphatic teachings on sexual ethics. They also express concern that Francis’s off-the-cuff statements – like when he once remarked that God loves gay people as they are, or when he wrote to a nun congratulating her on supporting transgender people – create confusion about the Church’s stance. Some fringe traditionalist voices have even gone so far as to accuse Francis of heresy for his openness, a charge that mainstream Catholic theologians reject. The pope, for his part, seems undeterred. He has said he believes pastoral conversion is needed – that is, the Church must change its approach to reach alienated groups. In a recent interview, Francis reasserted that homosexuality is morally a sin according to Catholic teaching, but he immediately added: “Yes, but first let’s distinguish between sin and crime,” noting that it should never be criminalized and stressing the importance of context and intention in moral theology (Pope Francis Speaks Out on Homosexuality—and Further Angers ...). It’s a teaching nuanced enough to leave both conservative and liberal Catholics somewhat dissatisfied.

Embracing Synodality – and Conservative Fears of a “Changing” Church

Arguably the defining theme of Pope Francis’s ecclesiology (vision of the Church) is synodality – the idea of “journeying together” as the People of God, where bishops, clergy, and laity listen to each other under the guidance of the Holy Spirit. Francis has repeatedly said that “synodality is what God expects of the Church of the third millennium” (Ceremony commemorating the 50th Anniversary of the Institution of the Synod of Bishops (17 October 2015) | Francis). He wants to renew the Synod of Bishops (a Vatican advisory body created after Vatican II) and inculcate a more participatory, listening culture at all levels of Church life. In practice, this has meant empowering local bishops’ conferences, consulting the grassroots faithful on issues, and holding synods on critical topics with wide input. Francis even changed Church law to allow women and laypeople to vote in the Synod assembly for the first time in 2023 – a historic step toward including voices beyond the hierarchy in deliberations about Church direction.

Conservatives have viewed these moves with suspicion, sometimes outright alarm. Cardinal Raymond Burke – the same figure critical of the liturgical changes – has been one of the most strident critics of the Synod on Synodality, the multi-year global consultation process Francis initiated. Burke warned that the synodal process, as designed, “has ‘wildly’ spread confusion and error and their fruit, division – indeed schism – to the grave harm of many souls” (Burke claims Pope’s synod will foster ‘confusion, error and division’ | Crux). He and others cite the example of the German “Synodal Path”, a reform dialogue in Germany that has controversially called for changes like women’s ordination and blessing same-sex unions, as evidence that synodality can spiral into challenges to established doctrine. As the Vatican’s October 2023 Synod assembly approached, Burke co-authored a booklet foreword that described the synodal process as “deeply harmful and potentially schismatic,” claiming it threatens to “profoundly modify the hierarchical constitution” of the Church (Cardinal Burke says his concerns about synod are sign of faith) (Burke claims Pope’s synod will foster ‘confusion, error and division’ | Crux). He portrayed the synod as a vehicle for injecting “confusion and error” into Church teaching on faith and morals (Burke claims Pope’s synod will foster ‘confusion, error and division’ | Crux). In Burke’s view, the pope’s emphasis on listening and dialogue risked undermining the clear lines of authority and truth in Catholicism – an impression shared by some other traditionalists who prefer a more top-down model of defining doctrine.

Francis and his supporters vigorously contest that interpretation. They argue that synodality is not about changing core doctrine but about changing the culture of how the Church carries out its mission. The pope has said a synodal Church is one that “listens, learns, and shares mission,” citing the early Christian communities described in the Acts of the Apostles (Pope Calls for a "Listening Church." | America Magazine) (9 Years Ago, This Papal Speech Set the 'Synodality' Machine in ...). At the 50th anniversary of the Synod of Bishops in 2015, Francis outlined his vision: “The journey of synodality is the journey that God wants from his church in the third millennium… a synodal Church is a Church of listening” (Pope Francis: 50th anniversary of Synod renews the call to ...) (Ceremony commemorating the 50th Anniversary of the Institution of the Synod of Bishops (17 October 2015) | Francis). In practical terms, he has expanded synods from rather scripted events into broader consultations. The 2014–2015 Synods on the Family, for example, included questionnaires to laity worldwide about family life challenges. Those synods led to Amoris Laetitia, Francis’s 2016 apostolic exhortation, which cautiously opened a door for divorced and civilly remarried Catholics to return to Communion on a case-by-case basis. That move – arguably a fruit of the synodal process of discernment – was cheered by pastoral-minded bishops but deeply alarmed conservatives, who saw it as breaking with previous papal teaching on the indissolubility of marriage. Four cardinals (including Burke) even issued formal dubia questions to Francis, challenging him to clarify that Catholic doctrine on marriage hadn’t changed. Francis chose not to respond to those dubia directly, which further irritated his critics. From their perspective, Amoris Laetitia was evidence that a synodal style (with its focus on concrete pastoral situations and majority consensus) could lead to ambiguous outcomes that blur doctrinal truths. They feared a slippery slope: if exceptions could be made for remarried couples, would the Church next soften teachings on other issues?

Those on Francis’s side counter that he has never changed doctrine – he has only changed the approach. They note that Amoris Laetitia reaffirmed the ideal of lifelong marriage but acknowledged the real-life complexity families face, using the principle of discernment to help individuals in irregular situations. This, supporters say, is a classic Catholic method (going back to St. Alphonsus Liguori’s moral theology) of applying universal truths to particular cases with mercy. However, in the charged climate of today’s Church, even nuanced shifts can set off alarms. Prominent conservative theologians and clergy have published open letters and even book-length critiques of Francis’s synodal plans. In one such critique, authors accused the Synod on Synodality of trying to “smuggle politically correct ideas into church doctrine” – filled with “ancient errors and heresies” dressed up as listening to the Holy Spirit (Pope Francis’ progressive legacy nears judgment day – POLITICO). Cardinal Müller went on EWTN to denounce the Synod as a “hostile takeover” of the Church, using buzzwords like “inclusive” and “welcoming” as Trojan horses for liberal agendas. These dramatic claims reflect a deep distrust: conservatives suspect that Francis’s push for listening to the “people of God” is a veiled attempt to legitimize progressive demands (on issues like women’s ordination, LGBT blessings, married priests, etc.) that the hierarchy had previously shut down.

The reality of the synodal process so far is more complex and, some would say, more modest. The first session of the Synod on Synodality in October 2023 produced a final report that included only cautious references to hot-button topics. For instance, the discussions about welcoming LGBTQ+ Catholics were distilled into one line acknowledging that people “who feel marginalized or excluded… ask to be heard and accompanied” (Pope Francis’ progressive legacy nears judgment day – POLITICO). There were no dramatic policy changes on those fronts – something that frustrated progressive participants who had hoped for bolder recommendations on inclusion. “The field of discussion has been narrowed to the point of meaninglessness,” observed one progressive Catholic professor, who suspected that some issues were “shunted off to a committee… to die, rather like the question of female deacons” (Pope Francis’ progressive legacy nears judgment day – POLITICO) (Pope Francis’ progressive legacy nears judgment day – POLITICO). Indeed, earlier in his papacy Francis had created a commission to study the history of women deacons, raising hopes among reformers, but to date no change has materialized on that issue. This pattern led Politico to wryly note that the pope is often “accused of teasing big reforms before either ditching them or rolling them out on his own confusing terms.” (Pope Francis’ progressive legacy nears judgment day – POLITICO) Both liberals and conservatives, the Politico analysis concluded, “are already unhappy” – liberals because changes haven’t gone far enough, and conservatives because they fear the changes that have been floated (Pope Francis’ progressive legacy nears judgment day – POLITICO) (Pope Francis’ progressive legacy nears judgment day – POLITICO).

From Pope Francis’s perspective, synodality is a long game. He often quotes a Latin American saying: “Tiempo es superior al espacio” – “Time is greater than space,” meaning processes are more important than immediate results. By that logic, what matters is setting the Church on a synodal path, not producing instant reforms by papal dictate. The synod is about nurturing a culture of dialogue and co-responsibility (Pope Francis’ progressive legacy nears judgment day – POLITICO) (Pope Francis’ progressive legacy nears judgment day – POLITICO), even if specific outcomes seem incremental. This approach has indeed “challenged conservative political visions of the Church as a culture-war combatant issuing edicts,” as journalist Christopher Lamb put it (For 10 years, Pope Francis outlasts the conservative resistance | National Catholic Reporter) (For 10 years, Pope Francis outlasts the conservative resistance | National Catholic Reporter). Francis’s vision of a “field hospital” Church – one that meets people in their suffering and tends wounds first – contrasts with a vision of the Church as an enforcer of orthodoxy besieged by modernity. “They wanted the Church to be a fortress… issuing condemnations and edicts,” Lamb said of Francis’s critics, whereas Francis sees the Church as a merciful healer in a wounded world (For 10 years, Pope Francis outlasts the conservative resistance | National Catholic Reporter) (For 10 years, Pope Francis outlasts the conservative resistance | National Catholic Reporter).

Ultimately, synodality as championed by Pope Francis represents a shift in ecclesial mindset more than a specific agenda. It has opened conversations on previously taboo subjects (like the role of women and laypeople in governance) and has elevated voices from the peripheries of the Catholic experience – young people, Indigenous Catholics, those in countries where the Church is a minority, etc. This in itself is a reform of internal Church culture. But it remains a work in progress and, as the heated debates show, a source of anxiety for those who prefer the familiar assurances of a more monolithic, top-down Church. Francis has tried to reassure that a listening Church will not abandon its core teachings; rather, it will find new ways to re-propose them and apply them. Whether that vision succeeds without tearing the Church’s fabric is one of the great questions as his pontificate moves forward.

A Pope of Paradoxes: Balancing Legacy and Critiques

Pope Francis’s reform drive has been anything but dull. In many ways, he is a pope of paradoxes – a leader preaching institutional change and humility while wielding strong papal authority to get it done; a bridge-builder who nonetheless has seen sharp divisions erupt under his watch. After more than a decade, how effective have his reforms been, and how are they perceived both inside and outside the Church?

It is clear that Francis has shifted the tone and priorities of the Catholic hierarchy. Issues like financial transparency, once handled internally with minimal disclosure, have been thrust into the open. A Vatican official under Francis now knows that being arrested or put on trial for corruption is a real possibility – a virtually unthinkable scenario in John Paul II’s time. Likewise, a bishop who mishandles abuse claims can no longer assume the Vatican will look the other way; new laws and structures mean laypeople can report him and an investigation can follow, potentially ending in removal. These are seismic changes in a Church that operates by centuries, not years. In the past, scandals were often swept under the rug to avoid scandalizing the faithful. Francis has largely flipped that script: he believes exposing sin is necessary for purification. “We must avoid the logic of cover-up,” he told curial officials, warning that the Church must face the truth, however painful, to be credible.

Yet the critics are not entirely mollified. Traditional-minded Catholics argue that Francis at times undercuts his own reforms. For example, they note that despite creating new accountability mechanisms, the pope has been hesitant to discipline certain allies. An oft-cited instance is Francis’s early defense of Chilean Bishop Juan Barros (later admitted as an error) or his initial support for a famously strict new order in Italy whose leader was later convicted of abuse – episodes that fuel the narrative that Francis’s instincts can be too trusting or lenient in some cases. Financially, while Francis has done more than any pope to drag the Vatican into modern compliance, skeptics point out that deficits persist and that a 2017 scandal saw the first Vatican Auditor General resign amid mysterious accusations – raising questions about whether the old guard stymied him. Some observers also detect a centralizing tendency in Francis’s methods that contradicts his decentralizing talk: for instance, in liturgical matters, he overrode what previous popes allowed, and in disciplining bishops (like some outspoken traditionalists), he has acted firmly from Rome. To his conservative detractors, these moves suggest a pope consolidating power and imposing his vision unilaterally. To his progressive critics, meanwhile, Francis hasn’t been unilateral enough on their causes. They are dismayed that after two synods and multiple commissions, Catholic women remain barred from the diaconate and priesthood, with Francis reaffirming that ordination is reserved for men. They note that he has firmly ruled out female priests and often speaks of women’s “feminine genius” in roles of service, which feminists find patronizing and not structurally empowering. Similarly, Catholics who advocate for full inclusion of LGBTQ individuals appreciate Francis’s kind words but ask: why not change the Catechism language calling gay tendencies “disordered”? Why not at least allow blessings of same-sex couples uniformly, given his emphasis on pastoral care? To these reformers, Francis has not walked his talk to the extent they hoped.

From outside the Catholic fold, commentators have alternately lionized and lambasted Pope Francis. Early in his tenure, he was a media darling – a pope of firsts (first Jesuit, first Latin American) who talked about economic inequality, climate change, and mercy more than sexual morality or ecclesial rules. His catchy soundbites (“Who am I to judge?”) and common touch (paying his own hotel bill, driving a Ford Focus, living in a guesthouse instead of the papal apartment) won praise for humanizing the papacy. In 2013, Time magazine named him Person of the Year. But as the years passed, some secular observers grew impatient for doctrinal changes that never came. Particularly in the West, where public opinion has moved on issues like same-sex marriage, the Catholic Church under Francis remains unmoved on doctrine – to the disappointment of those who perhaps overestimated what a pope willing to say “gay people should not be marginalized” would do. On the flip side, culture warriors and certain political conservatives – including non-Catholics – who once lauded John Paul II’s staunch moral stances and Benedict XVI’s doctrinal clarity have expressed wariness or even open hostility toward Francis. He’s been dubbed “the liberal pope” in countless headlines, and some U.S. politicians have rebuked him for speaking on climate or migration, telling him to stay in his lane. Francis’s papacy, in short, has been polarizing far beyond the Church itself.

Inside the Church, the conservative resistance remains a minority but a loud one. A small number of traditionalist clergy have even flirted with schism, though no formal schism has occurred. Francis himself has downplayed the risk, saying he’s not afraid of schism “because there is always the option of leaving” for those who don’t accept the Church’s unity, while also praying it doesn’t happen. In places like the United States, survey data suggest Francis is popular among most rank-and-file Catholics, but a segment of frequent Mass-goers and younger, more traditional priests are less enthusiastic. Many bishops, even if privately uneasy with some of Francis’s approaches, have publicly pledged loyalty and tried to implement his mandates (for instance, most bishops worldwide complied with Traditionis Custodes without protest, even if a handful sought workarounds for Latin Mass communities). In Germany, the progressive push has been more troublesome for the Vatican – bishops there, responding to secularization and an abuse crisis, have voted for reforms that Rome has had to gently, and sometimes not so gently, rein in. Francis walks a tightrope with the German Church: sympathizing with their desire for change yet cautioning them not to go it alone and create doctrinal rifts.

Catholic historians point out that reform in the Church is often contentious. They compare Francis’s efforts to those of previous popes: John Paul II was seen as a great evangelist on the world stage but largely maintained the status quo internally (some say he even centralized authority further in Rome, and he certainly took a hard line against liberal theologians). Benedict XVI began a clean-up especially on abuse – for example, he was the first pope to meet with abuse victims and he disciplined high-profile offenders like Maciel – and on finances he set up the initial anti-corruption frameworks. A Vatican journalist noted that “financial transparency and pedophilia are the two pillars of the process of reform that Benedict set up… [which] his successor has carried forward.” (The silent reform of Benedict XVI's papacy | Catholic News Agency) (The silent reform of Benedict XVI's papacy | Catholic News Agency). In fact, Francis himself has credited Benedict, saying that as Cardinal Ratzinger, Benedict “denounced [the filth] first,” enabling Francis’s own reforms to build on that foundation (The silent reform of Benedict XVI's papacy | Catholic News Agency). The difference is that Francis, with a longer reign and more political acumen, has been able to press these reforms more systemically. Unlike Benedict, who was a theologian often overwhelmed by curial infighting, Francis has proven to be a shrewd manager of change, willing to restructure offices (culminating in a new constitution Praedicate Evangelium in 2022 that overhauled the Roman Curia) and to sideline or remove officials who don’t get on board. This has earned him a reputation – depending on whom you ask – as either a dynamic reformer or a somewhat autocratic figure under the smile. “When there is an idea of reform, whatever it is, there is always resistance,” a Church historian observed, adding that Benedict XVI faced it and “Francis does today.” (The silent reform of Benedict XVI's papacy | Catholic News Agency) The open dissent of a few cardinals via letters and media interviews is indeed unusual in modern times (in John Paul II’s era it would have been unthinkable to publicly challenge the pope so bluntly). That it happens now is a sign of how Francis’s changes, style and substance, have unsettled the ecclesial establishment.

As Pope Francis enters the twilight of his papacy, the ultimate impact of his internal reforms is still playing out. He has appointed a generation of new cardinals and bishops more aligned with his vision, which likely means his successor will continue on a similar path. The Church Francis leaves behind unquestionably talks differently about certain issues – corruption, abuse, the inclusion of those on the margins – than it did before. Structures have been created that can outlast him, like the economy secretariat and the abuse reporting systems. But permanence in the Catholic Church is a slow harvest; it can take another papacy or two to see if these seeds bear lasting fruit. In the meantime, Francis has changed the conversation. Under him, it is now common to hear high-ranking churchmen use words like transparency, accountability, synodality – jargon that would have sounded foreign in Vatican corridors a couple of decades ago.

Perhaps the most balanced assessment comes from those neither ideologically left nor right, who see a mix of gains and gaps. They praise Francis for re-centering the Church on the Gospel’s call to serve the poor and wounded (he often says he wants “a poor Church for the poor”) and for challenging clerical privilege. They note that under Francis, bishops are at least talking about issues like financial ethics and the care of abuse survivors in ways they hadn’t before. At the same time, they recognize the frustration of many Catholics that change is slow and inconsistent. A popular saying among Vatican journalists is, “where you stand depends on where you sit.” For an abuse survivor, Francis’s reforms might seem too little too late; for a Vatican bureaucrat, they might feel like an aggressive earthquake; for a parish priest, they might hardly register in day-to-day ministry. Catholicism’s vast spectrum ensures that no single verdict on Francis’s reforms will encompass everyone’s experience.

What is clear is that Pope Francis has not been a passive caretaker of the papacy. He has governed with a vision of a Church that is accountable, collegial, and merciful – and he has taken concrete steps toward that vision, even if it has meant stirring opposition. In doing so, he follows in a long line of popes who attempted internal reforms (from Gregory VII’s medieval crackdown on simony to Paul VI implementing Vatican II) and met resistance from those wedded to the old ways. History will judge how deep and lasting Francis’s reforms turn out to be. For now, the Catholic Church finds itself in a dynamic tension between the institution that was and the institution that is emerging under Francis’s guidance. As he often reminds people, true conversion – whether personal or institutional – is a process, not a one-time event. By that measure, Francis has set the Church on a reforming path, even if the destination is not yet fully in sight.

Multimedia Integration Suggestions

To engage readers and illuminate the scope of Pope Francis’s reforms, a variety of multimedia elements could be incorporated alongside the article’s text:

  • Interactive Timeline: A timeline graphic of Francis’s major reform efforts could help readers visualize the sequence of changes. Key milestones might include his 2013 establishment of new financial oversight bodies, the 2016 publication of Amoris Laetitia, the 2019 abuse summit and Vos estis lux mundi, the 2021 Traditionis Custodes decree on the Latin Mass, and the 2023 Synod on Synodality. An interactive timeline could allow users to click on each year to see a brief description of that event and why it mattered, contextualizing how one reform led to another.
  • Vatican Finances Infographic: A clear infographic could break down the complex Vatican financial apparatus before and after Francis. This might include a chart of the various departments (IOR, Secretariat for the Economy, APSA, etc.) and show changes such as the creation of the Economy Secretariat and the role of the Auditor General. It could also visualize the impact of reforms: for instance, showing a reduction in the number of anonymous bank accounts, or highlighting a comparison of Moneyval compliance ratings from the time Benedict XVI first invited evaluations to the present day. A simplified flowchart could depict how a donation from a Catholic around the world moves through Vatican finances under the new transparency measures versus the old system.
  • Abuse Policy Explainer: An interactive module or flowchart could guide readers through the Church’s current abuse prevention and accountability protocols. It might start with “Step 1: Reporting an Allegation” (showing how a victim or whistleblower can use a diocesan hotline established under Vos estis), then “Step 2: Investigation” (illustrating the role of the metropolitan archbishop or Vatican appointed official in investigating a bishop, or the process a priest accused goes through under the new canon law norms). “Step 3: Outcome” could show the potential results – Church trials, laicization, criminal referral to civil authorities, etc. This could be accompanied by brief stats (e.g., X number of priests defrocked globally since 2013; X bishops investigated under the new system). Such a visual explainer would demystify the often confusing legal procedures and show readers the tangible mechanisms Francis put in place to combat abuse.
  • Global Reactions Map: A world map infographic could highlight different pockets of support and resistance to Francis’s reforms. For example, clicking on the United States might show a tooltip about U.S. conservative Catholic media and the reaction to Traditionis Custodes or Amoris Laetitia. Clicking on Germany could display information about the progressive Synodal Path and how it both resonates with and goes beyond Francis’s agenda. This map could include photos – e.g., a small image of a Latin Mass being celebrated in a U.S. parish vs. an image of German Catholics in a synodal meeting – to give a visual sense of the diversity in the Church’s response. It would reinforce the article’s theme that the impact of Francis’s reforms varies widely across the Catholic world.
  • Quote Carousel or Video Clips: Embedding short video clips of Pope Francis speaking could enrich the story – for instance, a snippet of his famous “Who am I to judge?” remark, or a portion of his address at the end of the 2019 abuse summit where he says “the Church will spare no effort to do justice”. A quote carousel could likewise cycle through notable statements: one from Francis (such as the synodality quote: “It is precisely this path of synodality which God expects of the Church…”【42†L68-L75}), one from a critic like Cardinal Burke about “confusion and error”, one from a survivor advocate reacting to Francis, and one from a Catholic scholar analyzing the reforms. This provides an audio-visual layer that captures the emotional timbre of these voices in a way text alone may not.

Each of these multimedia elements would serve to break down complex information and provide multiple entry points for understanding Francis’s reformist papacy. The goal is to make the story not just told, but also shown – helping readers to grasp timelines, organizational changes, and differing perspectives through visual and interactive means. Such integration would complement the journalistic narrative with educational tools, catering to both casual readers and those who want to delve deeper into specific aspects of the Pope’s reforms.

Sources: